Upstart Holdings, Inc. · Financials · Credit Services
Scores & Status Key
AI Summary Scores: Intraday / Swing / Long scores are synthesized from multi-factor analysis for each timeframe. They summarize current conditions discussed in the report and do not constitute trading recommendations.
Intraday Trend Score: A 0–100 composite from the Trend Explorer™ analytics engine used for ranking and comparison. It describes current conditions and is not a forecast.
Trend Status: A rules-based label (Bullish / Mixed / Bearish) derived from signal confluence (trend structure, momentum, and positioning). It indicates alignment, not expected return.
Last
$33.61
−$0.19 (−0.55%) 4:00 PM ET
After hours$33.35
−$0.25 (−0.76%) 3:12 AM ET
Prev closePrevC$33.79
OpenOpen$33.72
Day highHigh$34.66
Day lowLow$33.08
VolumeVol4,049,942
Avg volAvgVol4,786,490
On chart
Interval
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Scale: Linear
Overlays
Panels
Style
Scale: Linear
Presets
Tools
Tickers only (no ^ indexes). Add up to 5.
Mkt cap
$3.23B
P/E ratio
88.43
FY Revenue
$997.19M
EPS
0.38
Gross Margin
100.00%
Sector
Financials
AI report sections
MIXED
UPST
Upstart Holdings, Inc.
No AI report section text found yet for this symbol.
UPST Investor Alert: Upstart Holdings Securities Fraud Lawsuit - Investors With Losses May Seek to Lead the Class Action After Executives Allegedly Inflated AI Projections: Levi & Korsinsky
Upstart Holdings faces a securities class action lawsuit after allegedly inflating AI model performance projections. The company's flagship AI underwriting model suppressed loan approvals in Q3 2025, leading to a $4.49 per share (9.71%) decline and a $44 million revenue guidance cut. Institutional investors who purchased shares between May 14, 2025 and November 4, 2025 may seek lead plaintiff status by the June 8, 2026 deadline.
Company faces securities fraud allegations for allegedly inflating AI model performance, resulting in significant stock price decline (9.71%), substantial revenue guidance reduction ($44 million cut), and a class action lawsuit with institutional investor participation.
NegativeGlobeNewswire Inc.• Rosen Law Firm
GOSS DEADLINE NOTICE: ROSEN, RECOGNIZED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Gossamer Bio, Inc. Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K to Secure Counsel Before Important June 1 Deadline in Securities Class Action – GOSS
Rosen Law Firm has issued deadline notices for securities class action lawsuits against Gossamer Bio, Upstart Holdings, and POET Technologies. Investors with losses exceeding $100K are encouraged to secure counsel before upcoming deadlines. The lawsuits allege false and misleading statements regarding clinical trial design and other material facts.
GOSSUPSTPOETsecurities class actioninvestor losseslead plaintiff deadlinefalse statementsclinical trial
Sentiment note
Company is subject to securities class action lawsuit with an upcoming June 8 deadline, indicating alleged securities violations and investor losses.
NegativeGlobeNewswire Inc.• Rosen Law Firm
UPST DEADLINE NOTICE: ROSEN, LEADING TRIAL ATTORNEYS, Encourages Upstart Holdings, Inc. Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K to Secure Counsel Before Important June 8 Deadline in Securities Class Action – UPST
Rosen Law Firm is notifying investors in Upstart Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: UPST) of a June 8, 2026 deadline to join a securities class action lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges that Upstart made false and misleading statements regarding its Model 22 AI risk assessment tool, claiming it frequently overreacted to negative macroeconomic signals, overstated accuracy, and negatively impacted revenue results, rendering the company's 2025 revenue guidance unreliable.
UPSTsecurities class actionlead plaintiff deadlineModel 22false statementsmisleading disclosuresrevenue guidanceinvestor losses
Sentiment note
The company is the subject of a securities class action lawsuit alleging material misstatements and omissions regarding its AI model's performance and accuracy. The lawsuit claims defendants made false statements about Model 22's capabilities and that the model's conservative assessment negatively impacted revenue, making previously issued guidance unreliable.
NegativeGlobeNewswire Inc.• The Gross Law Firm
UPST DEADLINE: The Gross Law Firm Reminds Upstart, Inc. Investors of Upcoming Securities Class Action Deadline
A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Upstart, Inc. alleging that the company issued materially false and misleading statements regarding its AI Model 22. The complaint claims the model frequently overreacted to negative macroeconomic signals, leading to overstated accuracy claims and overly conservative credit assessments that negatively impacted revenue. The deadline for lead plaintiff registration is June 8, 2026.
UPSTsecurities class actionUpstart IncAI modelfalse statementsmisleading disclosurerevenue guidancelead plaintiff deadline
Sentiment note
The company is facing a securities class action lawsuit alleging material misstatements and omissions regarding its AI Model 22's performance and accuracy. The allegations suggest the company overstated the model's capabilities and failed to disclose its negative impact on revenue, which constitutes fraud and investor harm.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Pamela Kock
Upstart vs. Pagaya Technologies: Which Financial Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?
Upstart and Pagaya Technologies both use AI to revolutionize lending by replacing traditional credit scores. Upstart generated $1.1B in revenue with $53.6M net income but faces risks from high customer concentration and negative free cash flow of -$166.1M. Pagaya achieved $1.3B revenue with $81.4M net income and positive free cash flow of $224.7M, trading at lower valuations. For long-term investors, Pagaya appears to offer a more balanced opportunity due to its superior financial health and less direct exposure to borrower defaults.
Strong revenue growth (58.9% YoY) and profitability demonstrate market traction, but significant concerns include high customer concentration (61% from top 3 partners), negative free cash flow (-$166.1M), elevated debt-to-equity ratio (2.3x), and vulnerability to macroeconomic factors. First-mover advantage is offset by operational risks.
PositiveThe Motley Fool• James Brumley
Upstart's Auto Loan Push Is the 1 Story That Could Change the AI Lending Thesis
Upstart Holdings is expanding beyond its core unsecured personal loan business into auto loans and mortgages, with Q1 auto loan originations quadrupling year-over-year to $263 million and mortgage originations reaching $143 million. While these segments remain small compared to the $3 billion in personal loans, they represent significant growth opportunities given the massive size of the auto loan ($1.7 trillion) and mortgage ($18.8 trillion) markets. The company has originated only 12,202 car loans and 2,300 home loans versus 410,854 personal loans, indicating substantial room for market penetration.
The company is demonstrating strong growth acceleration in high-margin markets (auto loans quadrupled YoY), with its AI-powered credit scoring algorithm proving superior to traditional methods. The expansion into larger loan markets (autos and mortgages) from its smaller personal loan base presents substantial long-term growth potential, though current penetration remains minimal.
NegativeGlobeNewswire Inc.• Rosen Law Firm
ROSEN, A TOP RANKED LAW FIRM, Encourages Upstart Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important June 8 Deadline in Securities Class Action – UPST
A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Upstart Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: UPST) alleging that the company made false and misleading statements regarding its Model 22 AI risk assessment tool. The lawsuit claims the model frequently overreacted to negative macroeconomic signals, leading to overstated accuracy claims and inflated revenue guidance for 2025. Investors who purchased UPST securities between May 14, 2025 and November 4, 2025 may be eligible to join the class action with a lead plaintiff deadline of June 8, 2026.
UPSTsecurities class actionfalse statementsModel 22revenue guidanceinvestor damageslead plaintiff deadline
Sentiment note
The company is the subject of a securities class action lawsuit alleging material misstatements and omissions regarding its AI model's accuracy and performance, which resulted in overstated revenue guidance and investor losses.
NegativeGlobeNewswire Inc.• Rosen Law Firm
ROSEN, GLOBAL INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Graphic Packaging Holding Company Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – GPK
Rosen Law Firm is soliciting investors for multiple securities class action lawsuits. The primary case involves Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK), where investors who purchased securities between February 4, 2025 and February 2, 2026 may be eligible for compensation. The lawsuit alleges that Graphic Packaging made false statements regarding inventory management, demand, costs, and financial guidance. The lead plaintiff deadline is July 6, 2026. Additional class actions are mentioned for Upstart Holdings (UPST) and Immutep Ltd. (IMMP).
GPKUPSTIMMPsecurities class actionfalse statementsinvestor compensationlead plaintifffinancial guidance
Sentiment note
The company is subject to a securities class action lawsuit, indicating alleged investor harm and potential corporate misconduct, though specific details are not provided in the excerpt.
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LLC Urges Upstart Holdings, Inc. Investors to Act: Class Action Filed Alleging Investor Harm
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Upstart Holdings, Inc. alleging that the company made false and misleading statements about its Model 22 AI underwriting model. The complaint claims the model frequently overreacted to negative macroeconomic signals, overstating its accuracy and approval rates, and negatively impacting revenue results. The class period covers purchases between May 14, 2025 and November 4, 2025, with a lead plaintiff deadline of June 8, 2026.
The company is the defendant in a securities fraud class action lawsuit alleging material misstatements about its AI model's performance, accuracy, and impact on financial results. This represents significant legal and reputational risk to investors.
NegativeGlobeNewswire Inc.• Rosen Law Firm
ROSEN, A LONGSTANDING AND TRUSTED FIRM, Encourages Upstart Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – UPST
Rosen Law Firm is urging investors who purchased Upstart Holdings (NASDAQ: UPST) securities between May 14, 2025 and November 4, 2025 to join a class action lawsuit. The lawsuit alleges that Upstart made false statements about its Model 22 AI risk assessment tool, claiming it frequently overreacted to negative economic signals, overstated accuracy, and negatively impacted revenue guidance. The lead plaintiff deadline is June 8, 2026.
The company is the subject of a securities class action lawsuit alleging material misstatements regarding its Model 22 AI tool's accuracy and impact on revenue guidance. Investors claim they suffered damages due to false and misleading public statements about the model's performance and reliability.
NegativeGlobeNewswire Inc.• Rosen Law Firm
GOSSAMER DEADLINE: ROSEN, A LEADING INVESTOR RIGHTS LAW FIRM, Encourages Gossamer Bio, Inc. Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – GOSS
Rosen Law Firm is encouraging investors who purchased securities in Gossamer Bio, Upstart Holdings, and FS KKR Capital Corp. during specified periods to join class action lawsuits. The firm is seeking a lead plaintiff for the Gossamer case by June 1, 2026, with allegations involving false statements regarding a Phase 3 clinical study.
GOSSUPSTFSKsecurities class actionlead plaintiff deadlineinvestor lossesclinical trialfalse statements
Sentiment note
Company is subject to an ongoing securities class action lawsuit with an important deadline for investors, though specific allegations are not detailed in the provided excerpt.
NegativeGlobeNewswire Inc.• Rosen Law Firm
ROSEN, SKILLED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Upstart Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – UPST
A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Upstart Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: UPST) alleging that the company made false and misleading statements regarding its Model 22 AI risk assessment tool. The lawsuit claims the model frequently overreacted to negative macroeconomic signals, leading to overstated accuracy claims and inflated revenue guidance for 2025. Investors who purchased UPST securities between May 14, 2025 and November 4, 2025 may be eligible for compensation. The lead plaintiff deadline is June 8, 2026.
UPSTsecurities class actionfalse statementsModel 22revenue guidanceinvestor losseslead plaintiff deadline
Sentiment note
The company is the subject of a securities class action lawsuit alleging material misstatements regarding its AI model's accuracy and performance, which led to inflated revenue guidance and investor losses.
News and sentiment labels describe article tone and are provided for research purposes only. They are not trading recommendations or forecasts.
Trade Ranks App
Trade Ranks, LLC is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. All rankings and AI reports are for informational and educational purposes only and are not personalized advice. Investing involves risk. Policy Portal