TC Energy Corporation · Energy · Oil & Gas Midstream
Scores & Status Key
AI Summary Scores: Intraday / Swing / Long scores are synthesized from multi-factor analysis for each timeframe. They summarize current conditions discussed in the report and do not constitute trading recommendations.
Intraday Trend Score: A 0–100 composite from the Trend Explorer™ analytics engine used for ranking and comparison. It describes current conditions and is not a forecast.
Trend Status: A rules-based label (Bullish / Mixed / Bearish) derived from signal confluence (trend structure, momentum, and positioning). It indicates alignment, not expected return.
Last
$61.69
+$2.02 (+3.38%) 3:59 PM ET
Prev closePrevC$59.67
OpenOpen$60.41
Day highHigh$61.71
Day lowLow$60.09
VolumeVol1,450,134
Avg volAvgVol3,177,377
On chart
Interval
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Scale: Linear
Overlays
Panels
Style
Scale: Linear
Presets
Tools
Tickers only (no ^ indexes). Add up to 5.
Mkt cap
$64.32B
Sector
Energy
AI report sections
MIXED
TRP
TC Energy Corporation
No AI report section text found yet for this symbol.
AI summarized at 10:04 AM ET, 2026-10-01
AI summary scores
INTRADAY:38SWING:31LONG:54
Volume vs average
Intraday (cumulative)
−7% (Below avg)
Vol/Avg: 0.93×
RSI
44.92(Neutral)
Neutral (40–60)
0255075100
MACD momentum
Intraday
+0.00 (Strong)
MACD: 0.01 Signal: 0.01
Short-Term
+0.32 (Strong)
MACD: -0.37 Signal: -0.68
Long-Term
+0.31 (Strong)
MACD: -1.62 Signal: -1.92
Intraday trend score
48.89
LOW38.12HIGH48.89
Latest news
TRP•12 articles•Positive: 4Neutral: 8Negative: 0
NeutralGlobeNewswire Inc.• Tc Energy Corporation
TC Energy to host third quarter 2026 conference call on Nov. 5
TC Energy Corporation will hold a teleconference on November 5, 2026, to discuss third quarter financial results and provide an update on its financial outlook. The event will feature leadership including President and CEO François Poirier and CFO Sean O'Donnell discussing strategic priorities and growth objectives. The company continues to operate as a leader in North American energy infrastructure, moving over 30% of natural gas used across the continent.
The article is a routine earnings announcement and conference call notification. While the company's operational scale (moving 30% of continental natural gas) is substantial, the announcement itself contains no new material developments, financial performance data, or strategic changes that would warrant positive or negative sentiment. It is a standard corporate communication.
Shell has approved the second phase of its LNG Canada project in Kitimat, British Columbia, which will double production capacity from 14 mtpa to 28 mtpa. Phase 2 is expected to deliver nearly 6 mtpa of additional LNG to Shell with double-digit returns starting in the early 2030s. The expansion also triggers a Coastal GasLink pipeline expansion and a $7.5 billion Fluor contract.
TC Energy's Coastal GasLink pipeline expansion is unlocked by Shell's FID, nearly doubling pipeline capacity. The structure limits TRP's capital commitments and construction risks while providing substantial long-term operational revenue.
PositiveGlobeNewswire Inc.• Na
TC Energy announces sale of Guadalajara-Manzanillo Pipeline
TC Energy Corporation announced the sale of its Guadalajara-Manzanillo Pipeline in Mexico to ESENTIA Energy Development for $560 million (US$400 million). The transaction, expected to close in the first half of 2027, is part of TC Energy's portfolio optimization strategy to redeploy proceeds toward accretive growth opportunities in North America. TC Energy will retain its broader Mexico natural gas pipeline network of approximately 3,300 kilometers.
TRPasset saleportfolio optimizationnatural gas pipelineMexicocapital redeploymentgrowth strategy
Sentiment note
The sale demonstrates disciplined capital allocation and strategic portfolio optimization. The company is monetizing a mature asset for $560 million to redeploy capital toward higher-value growth opportunities in North America, while maintaining its substantial Mexico operations (3,300 km of pipeline). This reflects strong financial management and flexibility to pursue accretive investments.
NeutralGlobeNewswire Inc.• Tc Energy Corporation
TC Energy to host second quarter 2026 conference call on July 30
TC Energy Corporation will hold a teleconference on July 30, 2026, to discuss its second quarter 2026 financial results. The company's President and CEO François Poirier and CFO Sean O'Donnell will lead the discussion with members of the executive leadership team. The call will be available via phone and webcast, with replay available until August 6, 2026.
The article is a routine announcement of an earnings call with no forward-looking statements about performance, guidance, or strategic developments. It is purely informational regarding the logistics of the Q2 2026 results discussion. The company description highlights its market position and infrastructure leadership, but this is standard corporate boilerplate without specific performance indicators or material news.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Brendan Coffey
Vanguard Energy vs Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure: Which ETF Is Delivering Profits From Rising Energy Costs?
The article compares two energy ETFs: Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) with a 0.09% expense ratio focusing on broad energy producers, and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) with a 0.45% expense ratio targeting midstream infrastructure. While VDE offers lower costs and broader diversification with 111 holdings, MLPX provides higher dividend yields (4% vs 2.7%) and superior long-term performance, making it the recommended choice for capitalizing on higher energy prices in 2026.
VDEMLPXCVXCOPenergy ETFmidstream infrastructuredividend yieldexpense ratio
Sentiment note
Mentioned as largest MLPX holding at 9.1% with no specific analysis provided.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Robert Izquierdo
Which Energy ETF Stands Out, the Global X MLPX or the First Trust EMLP?
The article compares two energy infrastructure ETFs: Global X MLPX offers lower costs (0.45% expense ratio), higher dividend yield (4.10%), and better 1-year returns (23.20%), but with higher volatility and less diversification (29 holdings). First Trust EMLP provides broader diversification (65 holdings), lower volatility, and an ESG screen, but charges a higher expense ratio (0.95%) and offers lower dividend yield (2.80%). The choice depends on investor risk tolerance and income preferences.
MLPXEMLPTRPENBenergy infrastructure ETFMLPdividend yieldexpense ratio
Sentiment note
TC Energy is mentioned as a major holding (9%) in MLPX but is presented neutrally as a portfolio component without specific performance commentary.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Jake Lerch
Master Limited Partnership ETFs: AMLP vs. MLPX Faceoff on Fees, Returns, and Yield
AMLP and MLPX are two energy infrastructure ETFs with different trade-offs. AMLP offers a higher 7.6% dividend yield but charges a 1.01% expense ratio, while MLPX provides lower costs at 0.45% and better 5-year returns despite a lower 4.2% yield. MLPX holds 29 positions for broader diversification compared to AMLP's 14 concentrated holdings.
Second-largest MLPX holding at 9.26%, part of broader energy infrastructure exposure. No independent performance analysis provided.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Jake Lerch
Energy ETFs: MLPX Delivers More Income, Lower Fees
A comparison of two energy sector ETFs reveals distinct investment strategies: MLPX (Global X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) offers higher dividend yield (4.13%) and lower fees (0.45%), making it ideal for income-focused investors, while NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) has delivered superior long-term growth (146% total return over 5 years) but with higher volatility and lower dividend yield (2.29%).
Mentioned as a top holding in MLPX (8.54% position) without specific performance commentary; included as part of the fund's midstream infrastructure portfolio.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Eric Trie
Energy Cycle Upside or Midstream Income? XOP vs. MLPX
The article compares two energy ETFs: XOP (State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) and MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF). XOP focuses on upstream exploration and production companies with higher growth potential tied to commodity prices, while MLPX targets midstream infrastructure with steadier income through higher dividend yields (4.20% vs 1.83%). Over five years, MLPX delivered better total returns ($2,668 vs $2,073 on $1,000 invested) with lower volatility, making it suitable for income-focused investors, while XOP appeals to those seeking cyclical commodity upside.
XOPMLPXTRPWMBenergy ETF comparisonexploration and productionmidstream infrastructuredividend yield
Sentiment note
TC Energy is mentioned as a major holding (8.54%) in MLPX but receives no specific commentary, serving only as a factual component of the fund's portfolio.
PositiveGlobeNewswire Inc.• Trans Canada Trail
Sentier Transcanadien célèbre ses bénévoles à l’approche de la Journée internationale des sentiers
Trans Canada Trail's La grande corvée program has distributed $303,200 in funding to 119 community projects across Canada in its seventh year. The program supports volunteer-led trail maintenance, repair, tree planting, and volunteer recognition initiatives. The funding was supported by Athletic Brewing Company, Columbia Sportswear, Eldorado Gold, TC Energy, and the Toyota Sustainability Trail Fund.
COLMEGOTRPtrail maintenancevolunteer fundingcommunity projectsTrans Canada TrailLa grande corvée program
Sentiment note
Listed as a supporter of the La grande corvée program, showing commitment to community development and environmental sustainability initiatives.
PositiveGlobeNewswire Inc.• Na
TC Energy announces 2026 annual meeting Board of Directors election results
TC Energy Corporation held its 2026 annual shareholder meeting on May 7, 2026, successfully electing all 13 director nominees by ballot vote. The election results show strong shareholder support, with all nominees receiving approval ranging from 97.41% to 99.21% of votes cast. The company continues to operate as a leader in North American energy infrastructure, moving over 30% of the continent's natural gas.
TRPannual shareholder meetingdirector electioncorporate governanceshareholder votingenergy infrastructurenatural gasNorth America
Sentiment note
Strong shareholder support demonstrated by high approval percentages (97.41%-99.21%) for all director nominees indicates investor confidence in company leadership and governance. The company's continued operations as a major North American energy infrastructure leader and recent approval of expansion projects (US$1.5 billion Columbia Gas project mentioned in related news) further support positive sentiment.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Matt Dilallo
Prediction: Energy Transfer Will Hit $25 in 2026
Energy Transfer is predicted to reach $25 per unit in 2026, up 25% from current levels of ~$20. The rally is expected to be driven by higher oil prices boosting volumes across liquids pipelines and marine terminals, potential partnership for Lake Charles LNG development, and valuation multiple expansion as the market recognizes the company's improved financial position and growth prospects.
ETETPIENBKMIEnergy Transferpipeline stocksoil pricesLNG development
Sentiment note
Mentioned as a peer company in the energy midstream sector but receives no specific commentary or recommendation.
News and sentiment labels describe article tone and are provided for research purposes only. They are not trading recommendations or forecasts.
Trade Ranks App
Trade Ranks, LLC is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. All rankings and AI reports are for informational and educational purposes only and are not personalized advice. Investing involves risk. Policy Portal