AI Summary Scores: Intraday / Swing / Long scores are synthesized from multi-factor analysis for each timeframe. They summarize current conditions discussed in the report and do not constitute trading recommendations.
Intraday Trend Score: A 0–100 composite from the Trend Explorer™ analytics engine used for ranking and comparison. It describes current conditions and is not a forecast.
Trend Status: A rules-based label (Bullish / Mixed / Bearish) derived from signal confluence (trend structure, momentum, and positioning). It indicates alignment, not expected return.
Last
$211.65
−$0.44 (−0.21%) 4:00 PM ET
Prev closePrevC$212.08
OpenOpen$212.75
Day highHigh$212.75
Day lowLow$210.69
VolumeVol2,294,347
Avg volAvgVol4,983,167
On chart
Interval
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Scale: Linear
Overlays
Panels
Style
Scale: Linear
Presets
Tools
Tickers only (no ^ indexes). Add up to 5.
Mkt cap
$285.33B
EV/Sales
3.36
P/E ratio
36.87
FY Revenue
$93.50B
EPS
5.74
Gross Margin
20.35%
Div yield
1.30%
Sector
Industrials
AI report sections
BEARISH
RTX
RTX Corporation
RTX shares show substantial momentum across the one-, three-, and twelve-month periods, with the latest close positioned near the 52-week high and above key moving averages. However, RSI readings around 70 and valuation multiples above broad-market-style levels indicate that technical extension and valuation sensitivity are relevant considerations. Fundamental growth and cash generation provide constructive longer-duration context, while short-term liquidity ratios remain comparatively tight.
AI summarized at 4:02 PM ET, 2026-07-30
AI summary scores
INTRADAY:66SWING:74LONG:60
Volume vs average
Intraday (cumulative)
−20% (Below avg)
Vol/Avg: 0.80×
RSI
48.60(Neutral)
Neutral (40–60)
0255075100
MACD momentum
Intraday
-0.02 (Weak)
MACD: -0.07 Signal: -0.05
Short-Term
-2.28 (Weak)
MACD: 1.47 Signal: 3.75
Long-Term
-1.95 (Weak)
MACD: 8.15 Signal: 10.09
Intraday trend score
43.72
LOW43.72HIGH54.72
Latest news
RTX•12 articles•Positive: 6Neutral: 6Negative: 0
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Lee Samaha
GE Aerospace's LEAP Engine Deliveries Jumped 41% This Year. Here's Why Boeing and Airbus Both Need That Number to Keep Climbing.
CFM International (GE Aerospace and Safran joint venture) increased LEAP engine deliveries by 41% in the first half of 2026, which is critical for Boeing and Airbus to ramp up production and clear their massive aircraft backlogs. While the increased engine supply relieves supply-chain bottlenecks and benefits aircraft manufacturers' revenues and margins, it creates near-term margin pressure for GE Aerospace as new engine sales are typically lower-margin compared to lucrative long-term aftermarket service agreements.
GEBABAPAEADSYLEAP enginesupply chainaircraft productionBoeing 737 MAX
Sentiment note
While RTX's Pratt & Whitney produces the alternative geared turbofan engine for A320neo, the article notes potential spare engine supply constraints could benefit engine manufacturers, but the focus on LEAP dominance provides limited direct positive catalyst.
PositiveZacks Investment Research• Na
Can GE Aerospace Boost Profit Margin Amid Cost Pressures?
GE Aerospace reported Q2 2026 operating profit of $2.75B, up 18% year-over-year, but operating margins declined 130 basis points to 21.7% due to growth investments and cost inflation. The company raised its 2026 operating profit guidance to $10.55-$10.75B, implying 17% growth at midpoint, driven by strong commercial and defense aerospace demand and higher LEAP engine deliveries.
RTX expanded consolidated adjusted segment margin by 40 basis points to 12.4% despite 12.8% increase in costs and expenses, benefiting from rising aerospace deliveries, growing aftermarket revenues, and declining GTF engine-related cash costs.
PositiveThe Motley Fool• Brendan Coffey
ITA vs JETS: Which Is the High Flying Airline and Aerospace ETF to Profit From in 2026?
The article compares two aerospace ETFs: iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS). ITA focuses on defense contractors and aerospace manufacturers with a lower 0.37% expense ratio, higher 1-year return of 22.9%, and lower volatility (beta 0.74). JETS concentrates on commercial airlines with a higher 0.6% expense ratio and 16.9% 1-year return but greater volatility (beta 1.18). The article recommends ITA as the better long-term investment due to superior historical performance and stability.
RTX is the second-largest holding in ITA at 17%, contributing significantly to the recommended fund's defense-focused portfolio.
PositiveThe Motley Fool• Lee Samaha
RTX's $289 Billion Backlog, Explained
RTX's growing $289 billion backlog, driven by surging orders in both commercial aerospace and defense sectors, is a key indicator of future revenue and earnings growth. The backlog provides earnings visibility, de-risks the business from economic weakness, and drives long-term growth through profitable aftermarket services and recurring revenue. Management projects 2026 adjusted sales of $95-96 billion, with backlog growth dependent on orders exceeding sales growth.
RTX's backlog continues to grow amid surging orders across both commercial aerospace and defense businesses. The $289 billion backlog provides strong visibility into future revenue and earnings growth, de-risks the company from economic weakness, and drives long-term profitability through high-margin aftermarket services and recurring revenue streams.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Seena Hassouna
Which Aerospace & Defense ETF Is a Better Buy: Big Bets or Broad Exposure?
The iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) offers lower costs (0.37% expense ratio) and stronger 1-year returns (27.2%), but is highly concentrated with top three holdings representing 47% of the portfolio. The Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) provides broader diversification across 62 holdings with tech exposure, delivering superior 5-year growth but at a higher expense ratio (0.58%). The choice depends on whether investors prefer concentrated exposure to major defense contractors or diversified sector exposure.
ITAPPAGERTXaerospace and defense ETFITA vs PPAexpense ratioportfolio concentration
Sentiment note
Second-largest holding in ITA (16.78%) and top holding in PPA (8.13%). Major defense contractor with stable positioning but no specific performance assessment.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Sara Appino
Which Space and Defense ETF Is the Better Buy: ARK's ARKX or First Trust's MISL?
ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF (ARKX) delivers higher returns (28.8% over 1 year) but with significantly higher volatility and a 0.75% expense ratio, while First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) offers steadier performance (22.6% returns) with lower costs (0.6% expense ratio) and reduced risk. ARKX is suited for aggressive investors backing Cathie Wood's innovation thesis, while MISL appeals to those seeking stable aerospace and defense exposure.
ARKXMISLSPCXPLTRspace and defense ETFsARKX vs MISLactive vs passive managementaerospace industry
Sentiment note
Second-largest holding in MISL (8.43%), representing traditional defense contractor exposure in the passive index strategy.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Will Healy
Is It Too Late to Buy Ondas Stock?
Ondas, a military drone company, has surged 110% over the past year as demand for military drones accelerates due to ongoing conflicts. Despite a $4.3 billion market cap, the company has secured major contracts from the U.S. military and Israel, competing effectively against larger defense contractors. With projected revenue growth exceeding tenfold in 2026 and a forward P/S ratio of 8, analysts suggest the stock has significant upside potential despite its current valuation.
Mentioned as an industry giant competitor to Ondas in the defense sector. No specific positive or negative developments mentioned regarding RTX itself.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Joe Tenebruso
Why Voyager Stock Skyrocketed This Week
Voyager Technologies stock surged 70% this week following strong Q2 results with record bookings of $113 million and a backlog of $335.5 million. The aerospace company is benefiting from the Trump Administration's Golden Dome missile defense project ($84 million in awards), its Astrobotic acquisition strengthening NASA ties, and a new RTX contract for propulsion technology. Despite current losses, Voyager projects 66-84% revenue growth for 2026, positioning itself well amid expanding defense budgets and accelerating space investment.
VOYGRTXaerospacedefense technologyspace economymissile defenseNASApropulsion systems
Sentiment note
Mentioned as a defense giant awarding a contract to Voyager for propulsion technology. No specific performance data or sentiment drivers provided about RTX itself in the article.
PositiveThe Motley Fool• Rick Orford
3 Defense Stocks That Could Benefit From the Crisis in the Strait of Hormuz
Frontline, RTX, and ExxonMobil are benefiting from the Strait of Hormuz crisis through scarce tankers, depleted missile inventories, and higher oil prices. However, these opportunities carry different risk profiles, and a ceasefire could reveal which stocks have durable demand versus those riding a temporary war premium.
FRORTXdefense stocksStrait of Hormuzgeopolitical crisistankersmissile inventoriesoil prices
Sentiment note
Defense contractor benefiting from depleted missile inventories due to the crisis, indicating strong demand for defense products.
PositiveGlobeNewswire Inc.• Sns Insider
Military Drone Market Size to Hit USD 42.80 Billion by 2035 as AI-Powered Autonomous Defense Systems Accelerate Global Growth | SNS Insider
The global military drone market is projected to grow from USD 16.50 billion in 2025 to USD 42.80 billion by 2035, with a CAGR of 10.0%. Growth is driven by AI-powered autonomous systems, defense modernization, increased demand for ISR capabilities, and border security investments. The U.S. market is expected to expand from USD 6.31 billion to USD 16.22 billion, while Europe grows from USD 4.19 billion to USD 10.14 billion.
Listed as a leading market player positioned to benefit from increased defense spending and military drone adoption globally.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Sara Appino
Which Aerospace and Defense ETF Is the Better Buy: State Street's XAR or First Trust's MISL?
State Street's XAR and First Trust's MISL offer different approaches to aerospace and defense sector exposure. XAR uses an equal-weighted strategy with lower fees (0.35% expense ratio) and broader mid-cap/small-cap exposure, delivering stronger 1-year returns of 20.6%. MISL employs market-cap weighting with higher concentration in defense giants and tech companies, offering lower volatility but higher fees (0.6%) and lower returns (9.6%). For most long-term investors, XAR's lower costs and stronger performance make it the more practical choice.
XARMISLRTXPLTRaerospace and defense ETFequal-weighted vs market-cap weightedexpense ratio comparisondefense sector investing
Sentiment note
RTX is a major holding in both ETFs (3.44% in XAR, 9.21% in MISL), representing a significant aerospace and defense industry player. Its inclusion reflects the sector's exposure to established defense contractors, though no specific sentiment is expressed about the company itself.
PositiveThe Motley Fool• James Halley
Iran Tensions Illustrate Defense Supply Shortages That Will Benefit These 3 Stocks
Iran tensions have prompted the U.S. Defense Department to announce seven-year agreements with defense contractors to expand missile defense production capacity. Lockheed Martin, L3Harris Technologies, and RTX are positioned to benefit from record order backlogs and increased global demand for Patriot and THAAD interceptor systems, with all three companies showing strong financial performance and consistent dividend growth.
Main system architect and radar provider for Patriot systems with record $289 billion backlog. Q2 demonstrated 14% revenue growth, 29% EPS growth, 110 basis point profit margin expansion, and 22-year dividend increase streak with 6% raise, supported by global missile inventory replenishment demand.
News and sentiment labels describe article tone and are provided for research purposes only. They are not trading recommendations or forecasts.
Trade Ranks App
Trade Ranks, LLC is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. All rankings and AI reports are for informational and educational purposes only and are not personalized advice. Investing involves risk. Policy Portal