AI Summary Scores: Intraday / Swing / Long scores are synthesized from multi-factor analysis for each timeframe. They summarize current conditions discussed in the report and do not constitute trading recommendations.
Intraday Trend Score: A 0–100 composite from the Trend Explorer™ analytics engine used for ranking and comparison. It describes current conditions and is not a forecast.
Trend Status: A rules-based label (Bullish / Mixed / Bearish) derived from signal confluence (trend structure, momentum, and positioning). It indicates alignment, not expected return.
Last
$149.93
+$6.51 (+4.54%) 4:00 PM ET
After hours$149.99
+$0.06 (+0.04%) 12:34 AM ET
Prev closePrevC$143.42
OpenOpen$144.37
Day highHigh$149.94
Day lowLow$144.37
VolumeVol4,926,515
Avg volAvgVol3,980,750
On chart
Interval
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Scale: Linear
Overlays
Panels
Style
Scale: Linear
Presets
Tools
Tickers only (no ^ indexes). Add up to 5.
Mkt cap
$133.72B
P/E ratio
37.67
FY Revenue
$8.95B
EPS
3.98
Gross Margin
77.69%
Sector
Real Estate
AI report sections
BULLISH
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
No AI report section text found yet for this symbol.
Volume vs average
Intraday (cumulative)
+95% (Above avg)
Vol/Avg: 1.95×
RSI
53.54(Neutral)
Neutral (40–60)
0255075100
MACD momentum
Intraday
+0.03 (Strong)
MACD: 0.12 Signal: 0.09
Short-Term
+0.40 (Strong)
MACD: -0.30 Signal: -0.70
Long-Term
+0.23 (Strong)
MACD: -0.76 Signal: -0.98
Intraday trend score
75.50
LOW61.00HIGH82.50
Latest news
PLD•12 articles•Positive: 1Neutral: 11Negative: 0
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Andy Gould
RWR vs. GQRE: Which REIT ETF Is the Better Buy for Income Investors?
RWR and GQRE are two REIT ETFs with different strengths: RWR offers lower fees (0.25% vs 0.45%) and better one-year returns (21.45% vs 12.97%), while GQRE provides higher dividend yield (4.29% vs 3.35%) and broader global diversification with 205 holdings versus RWR's 98. The choice depends on investor priorities regarding cost, income, and geographic exposure.
Prologis is noted as a significant holding in both funds, representing the overlap in their portfolios, but no specific sentiment is expressed.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Sarah Sidlow
RWR vs. RWO: Should Your REIT ETF Include International Stocks?
The article compares two State Street REIT ETFs: RWR (domestic U.S. focus) and RWO (global exposure). RWR offers lower costs (0.25% vs 0.50% expense ratio), stronger 1-year returns (22.80% vs 17.50%), and better 5-year growth, while RWO provides broader international diversification across 224 holdings. For most investors, RWR's cost efficiency and superior performance make it the more attractive option despite RWO's global exposure.
RWRRWOWELLPLDREIT ETFdomestic vs internationalexpense ratiodividend yield
Sentiment note
Prologis is a major holding in both funds (9.8% in RWR, 7.7% in RWO), demonstrating its importance in REIT allocations, but the article offers no independent analysis or sentiment regarding the company.
NeutralGlobeNewswire Inc.• Na
Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. : Form 8.3 - PROLOGIS INC - Ordinary Shares
Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. has disclosed a public opening position in Prologis Inc, holding 11,577,440 USD 0.01 common shares representing 1.24% of the company as of July 8, 2026. The disclosure includes a purchase of 406,142 shares at $47.2747 per share and a transfer in of 3,337 shares. Dimensional also made concurrent disclosures regarding Segro PLC.
PLDDimensional Fund AdvisorsPrologis Incstake disclosureForm 8.3Takeover CodeSegro PLC
Sentiment note
The disclosure is a regulatory filing indicating a significant investment position (1.24%) by Dimensional Fund Advisors. While this represents a material stake, the form is a standard disclosure requirement with no indication of hostile intent, activism, or strategic changes. The sentiment is neutral as it is purely informational regarding investment positioning.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Eric Trie
XLRE Keeps Real Estate Costs Low While RWO Adds Global Reach
The article compares two real estate ETFs: XLRE, which offers low-cost exposure to large-cap U.S. real estate companies with a 0.08% expense ratio, and RWO, which provides global real estate diversification but at a higher 0.50% expense ratio. Both funds offer identical 3.20% dividend yields, with XLRE being more suitable for cost-conscious investors seeking S&P 500 real estate sector exposure, while RWO appeals to those wanting international property market exposure despite added currency and regional risks.
Prologis is identified as a major holding in both funds (8.77% in XLRE, 7.55% in RWO), demonstrating its importance in the real estate sector but without explicit sentiment or performance analysis provided.
NeutralGlobeNewswire Inc.• Na
Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. : Form 8.3 - PROLOGIS INC - Ordinary Shares
Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. has disclosed a 1.24% interest in Prologis Inc, comprising 11,562,912 USD 0.01 common shares as of July 2, 2026. The disclosure was made under Rule 8.3 of the Takeover Code, with recent dealings including sales of shares at prices around $138.62 USD. Dimensional also made disclosures in respect to Segro PLC.
PLDDimensional Fund AdvisorsPrologis Incstake disclosureTakeover Codeshare dealingsSegro PLC
Sentiment note
The disclosure is a factual regulatory filing indicating a significant 1.24% stake ownership by Dimensional Fund Advisors. Recent share sales suggest portfolio management activity rather than strategic intent. No positive or negative catalysts are indicated in the filing itself.
NeutralInvesting.com• Michael Foster
AI Is Starting to Scare Wall Street - We’re Calmly Buying Dividends Up to 12.3%
While AI concerns create market volatility and the S&P 500 trades at a pricey 25x P/E ratio, the article recommends three closed-end funds offering attractive dividend yields and trading at discounts to their net asset values. These funds provide exposure to bonds, real estate, and regional banks while benefiting indirectly from AI growth.
Mentioned as major warehouse REIT holding in NRO; benefits from AI boom through data center and logistics demand, but no independent assessment.
PositiveThe Motley Fool• John Ballard
ICF vs. VNQI: Which Real Estate ETF Is Setup for Better Returns in 2026 and Beyond?
The article compares two real estate ETFs: iShares Select U.S. REIT ETF (ICF), which offers concentrated exposure to 30 U.S. REITs with strong AI-driven data center holdings, and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI), which provides diversified international real estate exposure with lower costs and higher dividend yields. ICF has outperformed VNQI over the past year due to AI infrastructure investments, while VNQI offers better diversification and cost efficiency.
Prologis is a significant ICF holding (7.69%) with exposure to AI infrastructure build-out through data center properties, supporting ICF's superior returns.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Andy Gould
VNQ vs. SCHH: Which Real Estate ETF Is the Better Buy?
The article compares two real estate ETFs: Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH). VNQ offers a higher dividend yield of 3.64% but charges a 0.13% expense ratio, while SCHH has a lower 0.07% expense ratio with a 2.78% dividend yield. The choice depends on investor priorities: VNQ suits income-focused investors near retirement, while SCHH appeals to long-term growth investors in accumulation mode.
VNQSCHHWELLPLDreal estate ETFREITdividend yieldexpense ratio
Sentiment note
Listed as a major holding in both funds (7.1% in VNQ, 8.9% in SCHH), demonstrating its importance in the REIT sector but without explicit positive or negative commentary.
NeutralGlobeNewswire Inc.• Na
Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. : Form 8.3 - PROLOGIS INC - Ordinary Shares
Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. has disclosed a public opening position in Prologis Inc, holding 11,523,534 USD 0.01 common shares representing 1.24% of the company as of June 26, 2026. The disclosure includes a purchase of 5,401 shares at $139.97 per share and a transfer in of 5,202 shares. Dimensional also made concurrent disclosures regarding Segro PLC.
The disclosure is a regulatory filing indicating Dimensional Fund Advisors' investment position crossing the 1% threshold. This is a factual disclosure with no inherent positive or negative implications; it simply reflects an institutional investor's shareholding and recent purchases at market prices.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Josh Kohn-Lindquist
Lineage vs. Rexford Industrial Realty: Which Real Estate Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?
The article compares two industrial REITs: Lineage, a global cold storage leader operating 500+ facilities across three continents, and Rexford Industrial Realty, which dominates Southern California's infill market with 400+ properties. While both trade at attractive valuations, the author recommends Lineage due to its essential operations, global diversification, and lower valuation multiples, despite Rexford's strong 9.9% annual returns since 2013.
LINEREXRREXRPBREXRPCindustrial REITscold storagereal estate investmentSouthern California
Sentiment note
Mentioned as a large national competitor to Rexford Industrial Realty in the industrial real estate space. No specific performance analysis or recommendation provided.
NeutralGlobeNewswire Inc.• Na
Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. : Form 8.3 - SEGRO PLC - Ordinary Shares
Dimensional Fund Advisors Ltd. has disclosed a 1.14% interest in Segro PLC comprising 15,392,411 ordinary shares as of June 25, 2026. The disclosure includes a sale of 1,532 shares at 8.80 GBP per unit and a transfer in of 4,680 shares. Dimensional also made concurrent disclosures regarding Prologis Inc.
Prologis Inc is mentioned as subject to concurrent disclosures by Dimensional Fund Advisors, but no specific position details or dealings are provided in this article. The mention is purely informational regarding parallel regulatory filings.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Erin Kennedy
Schwab vs. iShares: Which U.S. REIT ETF Looks Best in 2026?
Schwab U.S. REIT ETF (SCHH) emerges as the more attractive option compared to iShares Select U.S. REIT ETF (ICF), offering a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.07% versus 0.32%, higher dividend yield of 2.8% versus 2.5%, and broader diversification with 120 holdings versus 30. Both funds delivered similar five-year performance, but Schwab's larger asset base of $10 billion provides greater liquidity and slightly better recent returns.
Listed as a top holding in both funds (8.95% in SCHH, 8.1% in ICF), representing a key position in these REIT portfolios without specific sentiment indicators.
News and sentiment labels describe article tone and are provided for research purposes only. They are not trading recommendations or forecasts.
Trade Ranks App
Trade Ranks, LLC is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. All rankings and AI reports are for informational and educational purposes only and are not personalized advice. Investing involves risk. Policy Portal