AI Summary Scores: Intraday / Swing / Long scores are synthesized from multi-factor analysis for each timeframe. They summarize current conditions discussed in the report and do not constitute trading recommendations.
Intraday Trend Score: A 0–100 composite from the Trend Explorer™ analytics engine used for ranking and comparison. It describes current conditions and is not a forecast.
Trend Status: A rules-based label (Bullish / Mixed / Bearish) derived from signal confluence (trend structure, momentum, and positioning). It indicates alignment, not expected return.
Last
$519.98
+$20.35 (+4.07%) 3:58 PM ET
After hours$518.19
−$1.79 (−0.34%) 4:14 AM ET
Prev closePrevC$499.63
OpenOpen$503.92
Day highHigh$520.15
Day lowLow$503.84
VolumeVol921,272
Avg volAvgVol960,322
On chart
Interval
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Scale: Linear
Overlays
Panels
Style
Scale: Linear
Presets
Tools
Tickers only (no ^ indexes). Add up to 5.
Mkt cap
$70.98B
EV/Sales
1.94
P/E ratio
15.79
FY Revenue
$42.89B
EPS
31.65
Gross Margin
20.06%
Div yield
1.89%
Sector
Industrials
AI report sections
BULLISH
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Northrop Grumman currently combines a strong upward price trend with bullish technical signals, as the share price trades near the upper end of its 52-week range and above key moving averages. Fundamentally, the company shows steady revenue and earnings growth, solid profitability, and healthy free cash flow generation, offset by elevated valuation multiples and moderate balance sheet leverage. Short interest remains low in percentage terms, while recent news flow is skewed toward negative geopolitical and competitive headlines, which may contribute to volatility.
AI summarized at 4:01 PM ET, 2026-03-02
AI summary scores
INTRADAY:72SWING:78LONG:69
Volume vs average
Intraday (cumulative)
+30% (Above avg)
Vol/Avg: 1.30×
RSI
48.76(Neutral)
Neutral (40–60)
0255075100
MACD momentum
Intraday
-0.06 (Weak)
MACD: 0.46 Signal: 0.52
Short-Term
+2.53 (Strong)
MACD: -10.37 Signal: -12.90
Long-Term
+0.29 (Strong)
MACD: -17.88 Signal: -18.17
Intraday trend score
80.67
LOW76.18HIGH82.76
Latest news
NOC•12 articles•Positive: 3Neutral: 9Negative: 0
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Sara Appino
GE Aerospace vs. Lockheed Martin: Which Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?
GE Aerospace and Lockheed Martin represent two distinct aerospace investment strategies. GE Aerospace benefits from a commercial aviation boom with strong revenue growth (18.5% YoY), high margins (19%), and a $210B+ backlog. Lockheed Martin offers stability through defense contracts with 72% U.S. Government revenue, though slower growth (5.7% YoY) and higher leverage (3.2x debt-to-equity). The article recommends GE Aerospace for growth-focused investors seeking rapid cash generation, while Lockheed Martin suits those preferring steady, predictable dividend returns.
GELMTRTXBAaerospacedefensecommercial aviationF-35 program
Sentiment note
Mentioned as competitive pressure for Lockheed Martin in the defense sector, but no specific performance data provided.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Todd Shriber
Boeing Fell Back Below $200 Ahead of a Strike Deadline. Here's Why I'd Buy the Fear After New Contracts Were Signed
Boeing stock has declined 11.3% over the past month and 26.7% from its 52-week high, but the author sees buying opportunity. The company averted a labor strike with 17,000 engineers and recently secured major defense contracts including development of next-generation carrier-based fighter jets and the F-47 to replace the F-15. Despite commercial aircraft challenges, the defense segment and government contract wins present potential upside.
Mentioned as a competitor that lost the carrier-based fighter jet contract to Boeing. No additional analysis or sentiment provided about the company itself.
PositiveZacks Investment Research• Na
Hexcel Gears Up to Report Q3 Earnings: What's in the Cards?
Hexcel Corporation is expected to report Q3 2026 earnings on October 21 with projected earnings growth of 29.7% and revenue growth of 10.1% year-over-year, driven by higher Airbus and Boeing production and increased composite material adoption. However, the company's negative Earnings ESP of -0.79% suggests the market may not expect an earnings beat.
Positive Earnings ESP of +0.30% combined with Zacks Rank #3 suggests better positioning for an earnings beat compared to HXL, with expected 6.1% revenue growth.
PositiveZacks Investment Research• Zacks.Com
Will Northrop Grumman (NOC) Beat Estimates Again in Its Next Earnings Report?
Northrop Grumman is positioned to potentially beat earnings estimates in its upcoming October 20, 2026 report. The defense contractor has a strong track record of topping estimates with an average surprise of 6.63% over the past two quarters. With a positive Earnings ESP of +0.30% combined with a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), the company has approximately a 70% probability of beating consensus estimates.
NOCearnings beatNorthrop Grummandefense contractorEarnings ESPZacks Rankearnings estimatesaerospace-defense industry
Sentiment note
The company demonstrates a consistent earnings-beat streak with a 12.28% surprise in the last quarter and 0.99% in the previous quarter. The positive Earnings ESP of +0.30% combined with Zacks Rank #3 suggests strong potential for another earnings beat, with historical data showing ~70% success rate for stocks with this combination.
NeutralZacks Investment Research• Na
How Is L3Harris' R&D Spending Driving Defense Technology Innovation?
L3Harris Technologies (LHX) is investing $536 million in company-funded R&D in 2025 to develop technologies across communications, space, and missile propulsion. The company's platform-agnostic approach and flexible business model enable it to adapt to changing defense requirements. LHX ended 2025 with a $38.7 billion contractual backlog, up 13% year-over-year, and is trading at a discount relative to industry peers with expected earnings growth of 9.97% and 14.48% for 2026 and 2027 respectively.
LHXNOCRTXdefense technologyR&D investmentaerospacemissile propulsioncommunications systems
Sentiment note
Mentioned as a comparable company in the defense technology sector with similar focus on space and national security missions, but no specific performance metrics or analysis provided.
NeutralZacks Investment Research• Na
Can Rising Demand for Turbojet Engines Strengthen Kratos' Growth?
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS) has successfully tested its TDI-J85 turbojet engine across multiple launch configurations, demonstrating its capability for unmanned aircraft, cruise missiles, and decoy systems. The company plans to produce over 3,000 engines in 2027 and achieve annual capacity exceeding 10,000 by 2029. KTOS shares are trading at a discount with a forward 12-month Price/Sales of 3.55X compared to the industry average of 6.84X.
Mentioned as a competitor with propulsion and unmanned systems capabilities positioned to benefit from defense spending trends, but no specific company developments or performance metrics provided.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Brendan Coffey
Firefly Aerospace vs. Intuitive Machines: Which Space Infrastructure Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?
The article compares two space infrastructure companies: Firefly Aerospace, which is achieving triple-digit revenue growth and recently accomplished a successful lunar landing, and Intuitive Machines, which has established strong lunar infrastructure capabilities with a $1.8 billion order backlog. Despite both companies operating at losses, Firefly is recommended as the better buy in 2026 due to its lower forward P/E ratio and stronger growth trajectory, while Intuitive Machines is positioned as a longer-term play expected to achieve profitability by 2027.
Mentioned as a major commercial partner of Firefly Aerospace, indicating business relationships in the space sector, but no specific performance analysis provided.
PositiveZacks Investment Research• Na
Can Rising Counter-Drone Demand Support RTX's Defense Growth Outlook?
RTX Corporation's Raytheon business successfully completed three tests of its upgraded Coyote Block 2C+RM counter-drone system, which features a tactical rocket motor, new seeker, and warhead to address broader drone threats. The advancement progresses from concept to testing in 15 months and demonstrates integration with existing defense networks. Growing demand for counter-drone technologies from the U.S. and allies presents growth opportunities for RTX and other defense contractors.
Provides advanced sensors, command-and-control systems, and electronic warfare technologies for drone detection and integrated defense operations; well-positioned to capitalize on counter-drone technology growth
NeutralZacks Investment Research• Zacks.Com
Can AeroVironment Expand Its Role in Naval Mine-Countermeasure Systems?
AeroVironment's VideoRay subsidiary was selected to support an AEVEX-led team for a U.S. Navy mine-countermeasure modernization prototype. VideoRay demonstrated autonomous underwater operations launched from an uncrewed surface vessel during competitive testing. The development builds on a $92.6 million Navy contract awarded in 2024 for production and development of the Defender platform.
Referenced as a developer of autonomous systems and defense technologies relevant to maritime modernization, but no specific news or contract announcements related to this article.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Jake Lerch
Firefly Aerospace vs. Rocket Lab: Which Industrials Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?
Firefly Aerospace and Rocket Lab represent competing approaches in the commercial space industry. Firefly delivers hypergrowth (163% revenue increase) but faces significant cash burn ($237.8M negative FCF) and customer concentration risks, with only 2 years of cash runway. Rocket Lab offers more financial stability with $2.3B net cash and 5 years of runway, but trades at a premium valuation (54x P/S vs. Firefly's 12x). For growth-focused investors seeking value, Firefly's lower valuation may appeal despite higher risks.
FLYRKLBLMTNOCspace infrastructurecommercial space racelaunch servicesgovernment contracts
Sentiment note
Mentioned as a major aerospace firm collaborating with Firefly Aerospace. No specific performance data or analysis provided in article.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Jake Lerch
Redwire vs. Rocket Lab: Which Industrials Stock Is a Better Buy in 2026?
Both Redwire and Rocket Lab are unprofitable space infrastructure companies with strong revenue growth but significant cash burn. Redwire specializes in mission-critical components for defense and civil agencies, while Rocket Lab offers end-to-end launch services and satellite manufacturing. Despite Rocket Lab's higher growth rate (55% vs 29% quarterly YoY), Redwire appears more attractive due to its lower valuation (P/S ratio of 6x vs 54x) and longer cash runway (5 years vs 8 years relative to burn rates). Both remain compelling for growth-oriented investors in the emerging space economy.
Mentioned as a major competitor to Redwire in the defense contracting space, representing competitive pressure on Redwire's margins and market position.
NeutralZacks Investment Research• Na
Can Lockheed Martin's Training Solutions Expand Its Defense Business?
Lockheed Martin announced a Direct Commercial Sale contract with the Philippine Department of National Defense to provide S-70i Black Hawk simulators, maintenance training, and support through 2032. This marks the first order for LMT's S-70i Black Hawk training devices and represents the company's expansion into military training and simulation solutions. With 2026 and 2027 EPS estimates showing growth of 31.7% and 8.44% respectively, and trading at a valuation discount to industry peers, LMT holds a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).
LMTRTXNOCdefense modernizationmilitary trainingsimulation technologyBlack Hawk helicoptersaerospace and defense
Sentiment note
Mentioned as a beneficiary of defense modernization trends with exposure to complex defense programs, but no specific contract or performance data provided in the article.
News and sentiment labels describe article tone and are provided for research purposes only. They are not trading recommendations or forecasts.
Trade Ranks App
Trade Ranks, LLC is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. All rankings and AI reports are for informational and educational purposes only and are not personalized advice. Investing involves risk. Policy Portal