Eli Lilly and Company · Healthcare · Drug Manufacturers - General
Scores & Status Key
AI Summary Scores: Intraday / Swing / Long scores are synthesized from multi-factor analysis for each timeframe. They summarize current conditions discussed in the report and do not constitute trading recommendations.
Intraday Trend Score: A 0–100 composite from the Trend Explorer™ analytics engine used for ranking and comparison. It describes current conditions and is not a forecast.
Trend Status: A rules-based label (Bullish / Mixed / Bearish) derived from signal confluence (trend structure, momentum, and positioning). It indicates alignment, not expected return.
At close
$1,203.00
+$5.47 (+0.46%) Close
Pre-market$1,202.17
−$0.83 (−0.07%) 12:37 AM ET
Prev closePrevC$1,197.53
OpenOpen$1,195.87
Day highHigh$1,203.69
Day lowLow$1,195.87
VolumeVol1,823
Avg volAvgVol2,815,219
On chart
Interval
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Scale: Linear
Overlays
Panels
Style
Scale: Linear
Presets
Tools
Tickers only (no ^ indexes). Add up to 5.
Mkt cap
$1.07T
P/E ratio
42.74
FY Revenue
$72.25B
EPS
28.15
Gross Margin
82.83%
Sector
Healthcare
AI report sections
MIXED
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
Eli Lilly exhibits very high profitability and rapid earnings growth alongside elevated valuation multiples and modest free cash flow yield. Technically, the share price has pulled back below key moving averages with bearish pattern signals even though medium- and longer-term returns remain solidly positive. Short interest and recent news tone appear benign to moderately constructive, suggesting sentiment risks are currently contained.
AI summarized at 12:26 AM ET, 2026-01-29
AI summary scores
INTRADAY:38SWING:55LONG:72
Volume vs average
Intraday (cumulative)
−38% (Below avg)
Vol/Avg: 0.62×
RSI
57.25(Neutral)
Neutral (40–60)
0255075100
MACD momentum
Intraday
+0.18 (Strong)
MACD: -0.35 Signal: -0.53
Short-Term
-5.07 (Weak)
MACD: 14.00 Signal: 19.07
Long-Term
-6.83 (Weak)
MACD: 52.60 Signal: 59.42
Intraday trend score
45.87
LOW45.87HIGH56.87
Latest news
LLY•12 articles•Positive: 4Neutral: 7Negative: 1
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Jake Lerch
XLV vs FHLC: Which Healthcare ETF Fits Your Portfolio?
The State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) both offer low-cost healthcare exposure with identical 0.08% expense ratios. XLV focuses on 60 mega-cap healthcare stocks and has delivered stronger 5-year returns ($1,332 vs $1,276 on $1,000 invested), higher dividend yield (1.60% vs 1.30%), and greater liquidity with $41.7B in AUM. FHLC provides broader diversification with 365 holdings including mid and small-cap stocks. Over 10 years, both underperformed the S&P 500 significantly, with XLV returning 157% (9.9% CAGR) and FHLC returning 159% (10.0% CAGR) versus the S&P 500's 301% (14.9% CAGR).
Largest holding in both funds (13.84% in FHLC, 16.11% in XLV), representing significant concentration in mega-cap healthcare exposure.
NegativeGlobeNewswire Inc.• Na
Novo Nordisk A/S - share repurchase programme
Novo Nordisk continues its DKK 15 billion share repurchase programme, having repurchased 25.9 million B shares worth DKK 7.16 billion as of 24 July 2026. The company has also filed a false advertising lawsuit against Eli Lilly over misleading GLP-1 medicine advertising campaigns.
Eli Lilly faces a false advertising lawsuit from Novo Nordisk regarding GLP-1 medicine comparisons, indicating regulatory and legal challenges that could impact brand reputation and market position in the competitive GLP-1 segment.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Brendan Coffey
Is the VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF or State Street Health Care ETF the Better Buy for Your Portfolio?
The article compares two healthcare ETFs: VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH), which focuses exclusively on 25 pharmaceutical companies with higher returns but higher costs, and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV), which offers broader diversification across 60 healthcare positions with lower fees. While XLV outperforms over 10 years, PPH delivers superior 3-year and 5-year returns. The article recommends PPH for investors seeking recent performance gains, though XLV offers better cost efficiency and diversification.
PPHXLVLLYJNJpharmaceutical ETFhealthcare sectorETF comparisonexpense ratio
Sentiment note
Major holding in both ETFs (16.5% in XLV, 20.6% in PPH), indicating strong pharmaceutical presence but no independent sentiment expressed in the article.
PositiveThe Motley Fool• Prosper Junior Bakiny
2 Top Growth Stocks to Buy Right Now Without Any Hesitation
The article recommends Eli Lilly and Intuitive Surgical as outstanding healthcare stocks to buy. Eli Lilly is positioned as a leader in the rapidly growing weight management medicine market with approved drugs like Zepbound and Foundayo, plus promising pipeline candidates like retatrutide. Intuitive Surgical, despite recent underperformance and headwinds, is viewed as a buying opportunity due to the successful launch of its da Vinci 5 surgical system and strong long-term prospects driven by innovation and high switching costs.
LLYISRGJNJNVOweight managementobesity epidemicpharmaceuticalrobotic-assisted surgery
Sentiment note
Leading position in rapidly growing weight management market with approved products (Zepbound, Foundayo) showing strong performance, deep pipeline with promising candidates like retatrutide demonstrating superior efficacy, and broader pharmaceutical portfolio positioning it as a top-performing pharma giant with continued growth potential.
NeutralGlobeNewswire Inc.• Na
Scribe Therapeutics Announces Pricing of Upsized Initial Public Offering
Scribe Therapeutics, a clinical-stage biotech company focused on in vivo CRISPR technologies, priced its IPO at $15 per share, raising $128.7 million from 8.58 million shares. The company will begin trading on Nasdaq under ticker SCTX on July 24, 2026. Additionally, Sanofi agreed to purchase 500,000 shares in a concurrent private placement at the same price.
Mentioned as a strategic collaboration partner with Scribe Therapeutics, but no specific financial commitment or transaction details provided in the article.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Brendan Coffey
iShares Global Healthcare ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF: Which ETF Is Better for Profiting With Healthcare in 2026?
The article compares two healthcare-focused ETFs: iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) with 110 holdings offering global diversification and lower volatility, versus VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH) with 25 concentrated biotech positions delivering higher short-term returns but greater drawdown risk. IXJ is recommended for its superior long-term performance, geographic diversity, and stability despite BBH's impressive 30.8% one-year return.
Mentioned as a major holding (10.9%) in IXJ; no specific performance commentary provided in the article.
PositiveThe Motley Fool• Sara Appino
Which Is the Better Healthcare ETF: First Trust's High-Conviction FBT or Vanguard's Low-Cost VHT?
First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund (FBT) offers concentrated exposure to 30 biotech stocks with 51.6% 1-year returns but higher volatility and a 0.55% expense ratio. Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) provides broader diversification across 400+ healthcare companies with lower costs (0.09% expense ratio) and dividend yield, making it better for long-term stability. FBT suits investors with high risk tolerance and biotech conviction, while VHT is recommended for those seeking healthcare as a portfolio stabilizer.
Largest holding in VHT at 14.19%, representing a major pharmaceutical company benefiting from strong biopharma deal activity in oncology, obesity, and immunology sectors.
NeutralGlobeNewswire Inc.• Not Specified
Cyllene Therapeutics Expands Leadership Team to Support Corporate Growth and Clinical Product Development
Cyllene Therapeutics announced the appointment of Alyssa Levin to its Board of Directors as Audit Committee Chair, along with two key executive hires: Clara Cambon-Thiebaud as VP of Regulatory Affairs and Céline Breda as VP of Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls. These appointments strengthen the company's leadership as it advances its lead candidate EG110A toward late-stage clinical development for neurogenic bladder-related incontinence.
Mentioned only in context of Alyssa Levin's current role at Radionetics Oncology operating under a strategic agreement with Eli Lilly. No direct business impact or news related to Eli Lilly is reported.
PositiveThe Motley Fool• Brendan Coffey
Which ETF Is Healthier for Your Portfolio: Vanguard Health Care ETF or iShares Pharmaceuticals ETF?
The article compares two healthcare-focused ETFs: Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE). VHT offers broader diversification with 411 holdings and a lower 0.09% expense ratio, while IHE provides concentrated pharmaceutical exposure with 56 holdings and has delivered superior 5-year returns (11.8% vs 5.4%). The author recommends IHE as the better buy for 2026 due to stronger recent performance and lower maximum drawdown, despite VHT's cost advantages.
Major holding in both ETFs (14.2% in VHT, 22.3% in IHE), indicating strong presence in pharmaceutical sector exposure.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Brendan Coffey
As Healthcare Rallies Is the Vanguard Health Care ETF of the Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF the Better Fund for 2026?
The article compares two healthcare-focused ETFs: Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP). VHT offers broader sector exposure with 411 holdings, a lower expense ratio of 0.09%, and higher dividend yield of 1.60%. PJP focuses narrowly on 29 pharmaceutical stocks with a 0.57% expense ratio and 0.90% yield. Despite VHT's cost advantages, PJP has significantly outperformed over 3 and 5-year periods (17.3% and 9.1% returns respectively), leading the author to recommend PJP as the better buy for 2026.
Eli Lilly is mentioned as a major holding in both funds (14.2% in VHT, 5.4% in PJP), indicating its significance in the healthcare sector, but no specific performance commentary is provided.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• James Brumley
Want Income for Life? Here Are 3 Stocks to Buy Now and Never Sell.
The article recommends three dividend stocks suitable for long-term buy-and-hold investors: Pfizer, which is developing new blockbuster drugs and entering the obesity drug market; Coca-Cola, with 64 years of consecutive dividend increases and a resilient business model; and Brookfield Renewable, which offers recurring income from renewable energy assets with 5-9% annual dividend growth targets.
PFEKOBEPCLLYdividend stocksbuy and holdincome investingdividend growth
Sentiment note
Mentioned as competitor in obesity drug space with Zepbound product, but not recommended as primary investment in this article.
PositiveGlobeNewswire Inc.• Truveta, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School Of Public Health, Duke University, Providence
New study finds GLP-1 receptor agonists associated with lower risk of alcohol-related hospitalization among adults with alcohol use disorder
A multi-system study analyzing electronic health records from over 40,000 adults with alcohol use disorder found that GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide and tirzepatide) were associated with 22-26% lower risk of alcohol-related hospitalization in patients with type 2 diabetes, and 32% lower risk in patients with obesity, compared to alternative treatments. Researchers emphasize the need for randomized clinical trials to establish causation.
NVOLLYGLP-1 receptor agonistsalcohol use disordersemaglutidetirzepatidehospitalization risktype 2 diabetes
Sentiment note
Tirzepatide (Mounjaro/Zepbound), an Eli Lilly product, demonstrated 32% lower risk of alcohol-related hospitalization in obesity patients, suggesting additional clinical benefits and potential market expansion opportunities.
News and sentiment labels describe article tone and are provided for research purposes only. They are not trading recommendations or forecasts.
Trade Ranks App
Trade Ranks, LLC is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. All rankings and AI reports are for informational and educational purposes only and are not personalized advice. Investing involves risk. Policy Portal