AI Summary Scores: Intraday / Swing / Long scores are synthesized from multi-factor analysis for each timeframe. They summarize current conditions discussed in the report and do not constitute trading recommendations.
Intraday Trend Score: A 0–100 composite from the Trend Explorer™ analytics engine used for ranking and comparison. It describes current conditions and is not a forecast.
Trend Status: A rules-based label (Bullish / Mixed / Bearish) derived from signal confluence (trend structure, momentum, and positioning). It indicates alignment, not expected return.
Last
$339.71
+$4.18 (+1.25%) 3:59 PM ET
Prev closePrevC$335.53
OpenOpen$338.58
Day highHigh$344.36
Day lowLow$337.56
VolumeVol6,305,777
Avg volAvgVol8,125,248
On chart
Interval
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Intervals apply to 1D & 5D.
Scale: Linear
Overlays
Panels
Style
Scale: Linear
Presets
Tools
Tickers only (no ^ indexes). Add up to 5.
Mkt cap
$891.03B
EV/Sales
4.70
P/E ratio
14.00
FY Revenue
$297.63B
EPS
23.96
Gross Margin
67.00%
Div yield
1.94%
Sector
Financials
AI report sections
MIXED
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
No AI report section text found yet for this symbol.
AI summarized at 9:44 AM ET, 2026-10-16
AI summary scores
INTRADAY:74SWING:57LONG:65
Volume vs average
Intraday (cumulative)
+26% (Above avg)
Vol/Avg: 1.26×
RSI
43.98(Neutral)
Neutral (40–60)
0255075100
MACD momentum
Intraday
+0.13 (Strong)
MACD: 0.34 Signal: 0.21
Short-Term
+0.76 (Strong)
MACD: -4.37 Signal: -5.13
Long-Term
-0.10 (Weak)
MACD: -6.77 Signal: -6.67
Intraday trend score
63.69
LOW46.51HIGH79.98
Latest news
JPM•12 articles•Positive: 5Neutral: 6Negative: 1
PositiveThe Motley Fool• The Motley Fool Team
JPMorgan Chase: 3 Key Takeaways for Long-Term Investors
JPMorgan Chase reported Q3 2026 net income of $15.3 billion on $50.9 billion revenue. The bank is prioritizing organic growth over share buybacks, deploying AI tools internally while restricting external agents for security, and projects $107 billion in 2027 net interest income. Management highlights consumer resilience and steady execution across market conditions.
Strong Q3 earnings of $15.3 billion, strategic shift toward organic growth initiatives signaling management confidence in long-term returns, addition of 650,000+ net new checking accounts, and solid 2027 NII guidance of $107 billion demonstrate solid financial health and growth trajectory. Management's disciplined capital allocation and focus on operational efficiency through AI deployment support positive outlook.
NegativeThe Motley Fool• Jennifer Saibil
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon Warns That Inflation, Rising Asset Prices, and More "Continue to Shift Under the Surface."
JPMorgan Chase's Q3 earnings missed expectations with EPS of $5.57 versus $5.93 expected and revenue of $50.17 billion versus $51.23 billion anticipated. CEO Jamie Dimon warned of multiple economic headwinds including large fiscal deficits, sticky inflation, elevated asset prices, rising interest rates, and geopolitical tensions that could impact the bank and economy. While market activity remains strong, particularly from AI spending, Dimon noted activity was already moderating in Q3.
Q3 earnings missed analyst expectations on both EPS ($5.57 vs $5.93) and revenue ($50.17B vs $51.23B). Stock fell after earnings report and has declined 10% over recent weeks. CEO warned of multiple economic headwinds and moderating market activity, though he expressed confidence in management's preparedness for various scenarios.
NeutralZacks Investment Research• Zacks.Com
TFC Q3 Earnings Miss Estimates as Securities Losses, Higher Costs Hurt
Truist Financial's Q3 2026 adjusted EPS rose 11.5% year-over-year to $1.16 but missed consensus estimates by one cent due to $1.4 billion in securities losses and higher non-interest expenses. The company benefited from record wealth management income and 3.6% deposit growth, but profitability metrics weakened significantly. Management projects Q4 revenues of $5.35B with NII of $3.65-$3.70B.
Q3 2026 adjusted EPS of $5.75 missed consensus estimate of $5.94, but reported net revenues rose 8% year-over-year. Strong equity trading, IB activity and loan growth were offset by subdued fixed income trading and increased expenses. Mixed performance with both positive and negative factors.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Jake Lerch
Navigating Financial ETFs: Why Fee Efficiency Wins, but Niche Yield Still Has a Place
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) outperforms State Street SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) with lower fees (0.08% vs 0.35%), broader diversification across 404 holdings, and superior 5-year returns (52% vs 14%). However, KRE offers higher dividend yield (2.3% vs 1.7%) for income-focused investors willing to accept concentrated regional banking exposure and higher volatility.
Mentioned as largest holding in FNCL at 10.33%, representing mega-cap financial exposure; neutral sentiment as it's simply a component of the broader fund analysis rather than subject of independent evaluation.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Anthony Di Pizio
This Unstoppable Vanguard ETF Could Turn $500 Per Month Into $1 Million Over the Long Term
The Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) tracks the S&P 500 Growth index of 151 best-performing growth stocks, heavily weighted toward AI and technology companies. With a 16.9% compound annual return since 2010 and 28.4% over the last three years, consistent $500 monthly investments could potentially reach $1 million in approximately 23 years, even at conservative 14.1% annual returns.
Non-AI holding providing diversification through financial sector exposure.
PositiveThe Motley Fool• Tmf Breakfast News
Breakfast News: Week in Review
Tech stocks faced headwinds this week as inflation concerns and rising bond yields pressured AI-related companies like Nvidia and Broadcom. CoreWeave's debt spike to $52 billion with 15% bond yields reignited AI debt bubble fears. Despite strong earnings, TSMC, Johnson & Johnson, and Morgan Stanley all sold off, while JPMorgan rallied on solid lending metrics. Consumer spending signals remain mixed, with JPMorgan seeing strength but Domino's warning of economic headwinds. Rocket Lab delayed Neutron's first flight to 2027 due to manufacturing issues. Valuation concerns persist across tech, with ASML, Atlassian, and Klarna highlighting the importance of entry price.
Missed profit estimates but rose anyway due to strong core lending business hitting new highs and raised lending-income forecast
PositiveThe Motley Fool• Bram Berkowitz
Ranking America's 4 Biggest Banks From Best Buy to Worst
The article ranks the four largest U.S. money-center banks. JPMorgan Chase is rated best for long-term consistency with industry-leading returns and premium valuation. Citigroup shows the most near-term upside potential following its successful turnaround strategy. Bank of America faces headwinds from low-yielding bond holdings but benefits from stable deposits. Wells Fargo, while solid, has already seen significant near-term gains and trades at full valuation.
AMJBJPMJPMPCJPMPDmoney-center banksROTCEtangible book valuebank valuations
Sentiment note
Rated as best-in-breed with industry-leading ROTCE (typically over 20%), strong management under Jamie Dimon, and excellence across all banking businesses. Recommended for long-term investors despite premium valuation.
PositiveZacks Investment Research• Na
JPMorgan vs. Citigroup: Which Stock Has the Edge After Q3 Results?
JPMorgan and Citigroup reported Q3 earnings with contrasting profiles. JPMorgan demonstrated earnings resilience with 6% net income growth, benefiting from higher net interest income and loan growth, while maintaining industry-leading profitability and a strong balance sheet. Citigroup delivered robust 40% net income growth as its multiyear restructuring gains momentum, with improved efficiency ratios and cost discipline. JPMorgan trades at a premium valuation (13.41X forward P/E) reflecting its stability, while Citigroup's discounted valuation (9.74X) presents greater upside potential if its turnaround succeeds. Both stocks carry a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) rating.
Strong Q3 performance with 6% net income growth, 13% YoY NII increase, diversified revenue streams, superior profitability, robust capital position (13.9% CET1 ratio), consistent dividend growth, and $50B share repurchase program. However, rising operating expenses and premium valuation limit near-term upside.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Geoffrey Seiler
Here's What $5,000 Invested in Nvidia Stock Could Be Worth by the End of 2030
Nvidia is positioned as a leader in AI infrastructure with strong growth potential through 2030. Analyst projections suggest a $5,000 investment (approximately 22 shares) could grow to $9,500-$12,650 by end of 2029, with more aggressive models projecting $13,640-$18,260 by fiscal 2031, representing 90-270% upside. The company benefits from continued AI capex spending, predictable GPU replacement cycles, and potential for earnings-per-share growth, though risks include AI spending slowdowns and increased competition from custom silicon.
Cited as source for AI infrastructure capex projection ($1.4 trillion annually by 2030), but not analyzed as an investment opportunity.
NeutralZacks Investment Research• Na
BNY Q3 Earnings Beat Estimates on Fee Income & NII Growth
Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) reported Q3 2026 adjusted EPS of $2.37, beating consensus estimates of $2.26, with a 24.1% year-over-year increase. Total revenues rose 11.7% to $5.68B, driven by higher fee revenues and net interest income. However, the company faces headwinds from rising expenses, deposit margin compression, and net outflows in assets under management. Capital ratios declined compared to the prior year.
BNYBNYPKBACBACPBQ3 2026 earningsadjusted EPSfee revenuesnet interest income
Sentiment note
JPM missed earnings estimates ($5.75 vs. $5.94 consensus) but showed 9.9% year-over-year earnings growth when adjusted for investment securities losses. Strong equity trading and IB activity were offset by subdued fixed income trading and higher expenses, resulting in mixed performance.
PositiveThe Motley Fool• Jake Lerch
Financial ETFs: How Do iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and Regional Banks ETF (IAT) Compare?
IYF and IAT offer different approaches to financial sector investing. IYF provides broad exposure to mega-cap banks, insurers, and asset managers with lower volatility and stronger 5-year returns (60% total return, 9.8% CAGR). IAT focuses on regional banks with higher dividend yield (2.9% vs 1.5%) but greater volatility and weaker performance (5% total return, 1.1% CAGR). Both charge identical 0.37% expense ratios. IYF emerges as the better choice for most investors seeking stability and growth.
Second-largest holding in IYF at 11.15%, a major mega-cap bank contributing to the fund's broad financial sector exposure and stability.
NeutralThe Motley Fool• Daniel Sparks
Invesco QQQ Doesn't Own a Single Bank, and That's Not the Only Thing the Nasdaq-100 Leaves Out
The Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ), which tracks the Nasdaq-100 index, excludes all financial companies and any stocks not primarily listed on Nasdaq. This means major banks like JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo, as well as NYSE-listed companies like Berkshire Hathaway, Visa, and Oracle, are absent from the fund. Despite missing the entire financial sector (11.5% of the S&P 500), QQQ has delivered superior long-term returns of 21% annually over 10 years compared to 13% for financial sector funds, though it underperformed in certain years like 2022 and 2024.
Mentioned as a major bank excluded from QQQ due to index rules. Strong Q3 earnings ($15.3B net income, 6% YoY growth) noted but no investment recommendation provided.
News and sentiment labels describe article tone and are provided for research purposes only. They are not trading recommendations or forecasts.
Trade Ranks App
Trade Ranks, LLC is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. All rankings and AI reports are for informational and educational purposes only and are not personalized advice. Investing involves risk. Policy Portal